Cat

I think we're all missing the most important question here.... If Mikey gets accepted, what color does he get to be?!??!?!??!

What I don't get is how you drop a 50 bomb, and yet you still end up in a tie?

:gaybe: :gaybe: :gaybe: :gaybe: :gaybe: :gaybe: :gaybe: :gaybe:

Technically, he does own part of it. And on the same note, neither do you. He still has a job to do of being an admin of these forums, and that's exactly what he's doing.

>Spends ~$800 on 2x780 Ti's >Spends ~150 on Z87 PRO Motherboard >Spends ~$150 on 16GB of RAM >Goes way overkill in EVERYTHING >buys an i5 The logic here is ridiculous, sure the i5 is plenty, but odds are you're limiting your GPU's because your CPU can't handle that many PCIe lanes. Both GPU's have 16x lanes, no? So that's 32 lanes. So in order for your GPU's to run at full speed at 16x both, your CPU needs to have more than 32 lanes capable. And that CPU can only handle 1x16,2x8,1x8/2x4. So you're actually bottlenecking your GPU's from getting the full performance out of them. But yet again with 2 780's, even at partial speed you can run today's games at full settings, so there's no big deal here. I just like to rant about stuff. :dave:

Yeah....you're right. :S What do you mean by CSGO being a console port? CS has been a series on PC for 15 years and will always be primarily a PC game. I"m also not denying the fact that CS:GO is more CPU intensive than GPU, I honestly haven't done the research + I have a good enough processor and GPU to run it at 300+ fps anyways, so I couldn't tell you. CS:GO uses dx9, as do most, if not all Source Engine games. And DX9 is pretty outdated, and most old cards can handle DX9 and the rendering capabilities of Source just fine. Anyways, as Zack has been saying, I'm done with the PC rant, because honestly I don't really know about whether this game is CPU or GPU based.

Not necessarily. It's more of the fact that CS:GO runs on the Source Engine, which is really not GPU intensive at all, and is meant to be able to run on lower-end machines. The problem isn't with laptops in general, it's within the graphics chip in the laptop. For example, newer laptops have 2 GTX 970M's and run today's games @ ultra at 60+ FPS. But older laptops, such as mine, with HD 5730Ms, can struggle. It's just outdated hardware.

Nothing, since if you use BraXi's logic here, the "square" is made up of two triangles, with the 5th "edge" going between the two corners of the square. It's the same with the triangle being made up of two smaller right-triangles. So two triangles - two triangles = 0? I can add pictures if my description sucks too much.

Can you add some screenshots?

A loop doesn't have to be infinite, just set your loop to be a specific time.

Incredible. That's what a real map is supposed to look like! Great job, you never cease to amaze me with your mapping skills.

Happy Birthday Gabe! :gaybe:

The keyword here is "TO ME". Sure, to you it's completely BS. However, to insurance companies, it's not at all. They pay people SPECIFICALLY to record this kind of data so as they know what rates to charge certain people. I'm not saying that just because you drive a red car that you're going to be a bad driver, there are hundreds of thousands of drivers who drive red cars and have 100% perfect driving records. It's just that statistics show certain things, and that's what's going to occur.

My apologies Pixel, shouldn't have used my American knowledge here and tried to apply our standards worldwide. I do that too often :s Yes, color of the car completely matters. Like Sentrex said earlier, some colors are drawn towards more people who tend to be bad drivers. For example, if you look at statistics, red cars are the most common for speeding tickets. However I doubt color has a MASSIVE effect on insurance rates, but it probably does change it by a dollar or two.

You're delusional. Steve Carrell's part as Michael Scott is absolutely gorgeous, and the entire storyline is amazing. Parks and Rec is funny, sure, but it's nowhere near as good as The Office ever was.

>is ~16 years old >passes license test >first car is an average car >second car is a freaking brand new BMW M5 :wat:

huppy burfdei

Please, for the love of God, don't play competitive CS at all anymore until you get a mic. It's hurting your team so much, you have no idea.

The Office. (US Version of course)

Well, since there's no "off-topic" section, thought I'd post this here. I'm currently stuck on a calculus problem, one that was on my midterm that I missed and I'm trying to fix it and study from it. It's a differential equation, so here it is. dy -xy --- = ------ dx ln (why) Ln(why) is the natural log of why, just for clarification purposes. Anyways, I need to find the general solution of the differential equation, and then I need to find the solution that satisfies the condition that why= e^2 when x=0. Here are the steps I did: Multiplied dx and ln(why) out to both sides, and then divided by why so I then got: (ln(why) dy) / why = -xdx I then integrated both sides, to get: Indefinite integral of ln(why) / why dy = indefinite integral of -xdx Which then turns into ln^2(why)/2 = -x^2/2 Multiplying out the two gives you ln^2(why) = -x^2 Since you have a square on either side, you can square root it, no? So then you get ln(why) = sqrt(-x^2). Which then turns into why = e^sqrt(-x^2) + C. Can anybody double check me here and make sure I'm doing this right? I thin I'm missing a step somewhere.... EDIT: Lossy you stupid idiot and your stupid filters, ruin all my math problems. D:<